Has anyone tried Deepseek V3? Does it work?

Though it’s hard to say about coding since it doesn’t have a feature like Claude Artifacts, where a separate window is created to see how the code looks as an output.

So my recommendation is to run Deepseek V3 locally (requires extremely expensive hardware).

It breaks down an instruction (or multiple instructions) as a chain-of-thought reasoning (or multiple micro steps) as it shows you its thinking process.

Do You Have Trouble Hearing People Talk In Noisy Environment? New Study Finds A Remarkably Simple Trick May Help. - TwistedSifter

But I find what makes it stand out from other LLMs is the Deepthinking feature.

I’ve just tried Deepseek V3 just so I could answer your question.

At first glance, it seems like a barebones version of GPT 4o or Microsoft Copilot, where you can upload documents or images (up to 50, text extraction only).

What’s a mistake most guys make when trying to get a girlfriend?

To answer your question, it definitely does work as an LLM.

So it’s a lot of copy and pasting when it comes to testing code on a separate website.

Plus, there’s no way to opt-out of using your data for training purposes, which is a huge issue (for the website version that is).

If we colonized Mars, what would a human being from Mars be called? I’d assume Martian just as one from Earth is called an Earthling or Terran in the case of Sci-Fi media.

Has anyone tried Deepseek V3? Does it work?

Read also: